From Larry Wohlgemuth…
Only when we understand the meanings of words can we truly comprehend the messages being sent our way. For instance, I knew a woman who called her two-year-old son her little dildo. Can you imagine the years of therapy that boy will need?
There are words, particularly obscenities, intended to elicit powerful emotions. Words like “fuck,” “shit,” and “asshole” won’t make you many friends unless you have a big smile on your face when you use them. Euphemistically calling someone a motherfucker could bring a laugh, or it could get your ass kicked, depending on its target.
Then there are words that have more than one meaning. For instance, the word bad can mean bad or it can mean good, and I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but that has to do more with vernacular than with the true meaning of a word. However the word capital seems to be able to be used with positive or negative connotations.
It begs the question, is capital anything with which we want ourselves associated?
This is the origin of the word capital from the Etymology Online Dictionary:
capital (adj.) early 13c., from L. capitalis “of the head,” hence “capital, chief, first,” from caput (gen. capitis) “head” (see head). A capital crime (1520s) is one that affects the life or “head;” capital had a sense of “deadly, mortal” from late 14c. in English, a sense also found in Latin. The connection between “head” and “life, mortality” also existed in O.E.: e.g. heafodgilt “deadly sin, capital offense,” heafdes þolian “to forfeit life.” Capital punishment was in Blackstone (1765). Capital gain is recorded from 1921. Capital goods is recorded from 1899. Of ships, “first-rate, of the line,” attested from 1650s. Related: Capitally.
The term capital punishment originated in France where the guillotine was used as the main form of execution. The punishment was “cutting off the head,” or “capital” punishment. Isn’t it curious how the word capital came to be synonymous with monetary assets?
Here’s what the Etymology Dictionary has to say about money:
Money late 13c., “coinage, metal currency,” from O.Fr. moneie, from L. moneta “mint, coinage,” from Moneta, a title of the Roman goddess Juno, in or near whose temple money was coined; perhaps from monere “advise, warn” (see monitor), with the sense of “admonishing goddess,” which is sensible, but the etymology is difficult…
It appears the word money doesn’t carry quite the same connotations as a word capital. Money possibly derives from words that suggest warnings and admonitions, while capital clearly indicates that it’s the most important. We’ve all heard the saying, “money is the root of all evil,” but who’s ever heard any warnings about capital? It wasn’t until two centuries later that capital came to be associated with stocks or other property:
capital (n.) early 15c., “a capital letter,” from capital (adj.). The meaning “capital city” is first recorded 1660s (the O.E. word was heafodstol). The financial sense (1610s) is from L.L. capitale “stock, property,” neut. of capitalis.
It was an attempt by the wealthy to shed themselves of some of the negative connotations of the word money by replacing it with the word capital in the lexicon. Interestingly, however, of all the words they could’ve chosen they selected one that would indicate they are the most important. Don’t think for a second this was an accident. The people with money were laying claim to their territory and making themselves number one.
So instead of being evil people with dirty money, they became “capital-ists,” the suffix meaning “one who” or “that which.” So a capitalist was one who had money, and not a rich, greedy bastard, and they practiced “capital-ism,” that is a “system, manner or condition” of having money. Maybe they should have thought ahead a couple of centuries, when the French peasants decided that it was a good thing to practice capital punishment on capitalists.
Taken to a logical conclusion, a capitalist who has a belief in capitalism would be one who exalts capital in the same way a Buddhist who practices Buddhism reveres Buddha. My friend, Denise, is fond of saying, “They’ve made Mammon their God,” and it’s hard to argue with that reasoning after you look at what the words mean. These people worship money to the exclusion of all else, but how does a person get that way? (Going spiritual now, so any who might be offended may choose to leave.) I believe there are four groups of souls on earth. The first are the new souls, people in early incarnations that seek mostly worry free lives, and they are given to behave petulantly. Their system of beliefs is defined mostly by the material, and even though they have plenty there’s a tendency to begrudge those less fortunate. Like a spoiled child, they don’t want to share. Most teabaggers would fall under this category.
The second group is the mature souls, people that have been here for several incarnations and are really getting the hang of it. They choose increasingly difficult circumstances for each incarnation in order to maximize their spiritual understandings. These are souls that are deeply committed to perceive and practice universal truths in all their affairs. Generally, they are the kind of people you would want to be your best friend.
Third is helpers. These are souls for whom it is no longer necessary to incarnate, but they have chosen to with the intent of helping those of us in the first two groups. Many of them achieve greatness, although usually not involving money. They are people like Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Mother Teresa. Often they have throngs of followers and believers, which tends to anger our fourth group of people, and it’s not unusual that they end up dead before their time.
This last group is the Earth-bound. These are souls that have made a conscious decision they like this level of consciousness, and this is where they’ll stay. Their existence is of this earth as are the things they worship, and Mammon is their God. Through many incarnations they’ve become adept at manipulating this artificial reality in which we find ourselves, and they’re willing to do so without regard to its affect on anyone else. These are deeply diseased and damaged souls who, without some sort of intervention, are doomed to spend all of eternity attached to this planet.
It became necessary for them to set up alternate belief systems, including creating a physical God rather than a spiritual one. Mammon fits the bill perfectly. Their success depends upon convincing as many of us as possible that they alone have the answers, and to succeed we must follow in their path. It’s the reason they’ve created religions which tell us we are born as scum, and that we need their version of God in order to be redeemed. If they can get you to believe the lie that you are any other than a perfect child of God, one of the true beings of light, then they can make you do all sorts of horrific things. As Voltaire put it, “Those who can make you believe absurdities can cause you to commit atrocities.”
Reality TV shows are testaments to Mammon. It’s a method to induce people to rip each other to shreds in return for money, and it’s served up as entertainment. What does it say about us that we would turn on these types of programs to be entertained? I think it says that we have a large percentage of immature souls on the planet, and the capitalists are using Mammon to sway them over to the dark side.
The question is, how many fight their way to the top of that hierarchy only to find it a wretchedly empty existence?
Capitalism is a religion, and Mammon is their God, and they don’t make any bones about it. Like gods, they want to rule the earth, and the only thing that can stop them is love. It’s time to go to work. If you can’t love them, at least love each other. It’s a start.





